The test on a rule 21.01(1)(b) motion has been defined in various ways but, in essence, it is that the action is “certain to fail”: Hunt v. Carey, 1990 CanLII 90 (SCC), [1990] 2 S.C.R. 959, at p. 980 (“Hunt”). The following torts are alleged in the statement of claim: negligence, intentional infliction of mental suffering and misfeasance in public office. At this early stage of the proceeding, the torts alleged have, of course, not been proven. Indeed we do not even have the respondents’ statement of defence. However, in assessing whether an action is certain to fail, all the allegations contained in the plaintiff’s statement of claim are taken as proven: Hunt at p. 979.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.