On a Rule 21.01(1)(b)(b) motion, can the allegations set out in the Statement of Claim be taken as true?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Diaz v Tossa, 2017 ONSC 54 (CanLII):

On a Rule 21.01(1)(b) motion, the allegations set out in the Statement of Claim must be taken as true unless blatantly ridiculous or incapable of proof. Bald allegations are assumptions or speculations that are by their very nature incapable of proof by the adduction of evidence, and therefore are not to be taken as true: Holland v. Ontario, [2000] O.J. No. 566.

Other Questions


On a motion under Rule 21, is a Statement of Claim taken as true? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a motion to extend time for service of a statement of claim in a motor vehicle accident just a "just resolution" of the claim? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a motion for a stay of execution pending a counter-claim, cross-claim and third party claim valid? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the legal tenability of a motion to amend a statement of claim? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the effect of an appeal from the order of the original motion judge, set aside the order dismissing the action and granted leave to amend the statement of claim as against Larkin? (Ontario, Canada)
On a motion to dismiss a claim for failure to disclose a cause of action, is the statement of defence sufficient to accommodate drafting deficiencies? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a motion to dismiss a statement of claim against a defendant in a marriage that was not a good faith marriage constitute a cause of action? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted privilege in a motion to amend a statement of claim? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for a motion to strike a statement of claim under Rule 21.01? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a plaintiff's new statement of claim that describes the nature of their employment contract relevant to a whistleblowing claim? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.