The standard of review on a judicial review of a decision of the Superintendent to uphold an IRP is reasonableness. On an appeal from the judicial review decision, the question is whether the chambers judge erred in law in the application of the reasonableness standard of review. That question is to be determined on the correctness standard of review: Sutherland v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2018 BCCA 65 at paras. 27–28.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.