What is the standard of review for a judicial review of a decision of an adjudicator confirming a roadside driving prohibition?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Clark v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2015 BCCA 487 (CanLII):
The standard of review to be used on a judicial review of a decision of an adjudicator confirming a roadside driving prohibition is reasonableness: Wilson v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2015 SCC 47 at para. 17. For a discussion of the content of the reasonableness standard of review, see the Kenyon decision issued concurrently with these reasons.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the standard of review for a decision of a delegate of a Superintendent confirming a roadside driving prohibition? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a judicial review of a decision of an adjudicator confirming a 90-day driving ban? (British Columbia, Canada)
How is the standard of review applied to a judicial review of a roadside driving ban? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the standards of review applicable to a judicial review of a decision made under the Rules of Review Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the reasonableness standard apply to decisions of adjudicators in connection with immediate roadside driving prohibitions? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review of a decision confirming a driving prohibition? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the reasonableness standard in the context of a judicial review of an administrative driving prohibition? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review of a decision by an adjudicator on an administrative driving ban? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review in respect of a police officer's decision to issue a 24-hour driving prohibition? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the standard of review apply to a review of a Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal decision to which the decision was patently unreasonable? (British Columbia, Canada)
