The medical specialists have done what they are expected to do – give their best advice as to what the Respondent should do. None of them, we note, has said, either expressly or by implication, that unless he follows their recommendations the Respondent constitutes a present, a foreseeable or even a remote, risk of harm to clients, the public or the legal profession. Cf. Law Society of BC v. Watt, [2001] LSBC 16 at paragraph [24].
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.