Is there any case law supporting the proposition that once a claimant has received a medical opinion that recommends that they be entitled to ICBC treatment?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Tiessen v. ICBC, 2008 BCSC 1822 (CanLII):

This submission is somewhat of an overgeneralization based on the conclusion expressed in the Redford reasons. As I read the whole of that decision, it appears to me that the judge engaged in the same review of the evidence as I have done here before finding that the plaintiff satisfied the conditions precedent to claim under s. 88(1). In Prato v. I.C.B.C., 2002 BCSC 676, the court, at para. 39, held that Redford is authority for the proposition that once the claimant obtains a medical opinion that recommends treatment for the injuries suffered as a result of the accident, he or she is entitled to have the treatment covered and would only become disentitled if ICBC obtains a contrary medical opinion.

Other Questions


Does a strong medical opinion support that a recommended treatment is both reasonable and necessary? (British Columbia, Canada)
What have the medical opinions of the medical specialists who have advised the Respondent to follow their recommendations? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a medical opinion supporting a claim for medical expenses unnecessary? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for establishing that a physician's assessment of pain, disability and recommended treatment is based on a medical opinion? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to the full costs of prescription medication and the massage and physiotherapy treatments recommended by the treating physician? (British Columbia, Canada)
If a claimant has no means with which to pay support to the respondent, would she have been entitled to spousal support? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the medical evidence that supports medical evidence in support of future care costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the claimant's remarriage affect her entitlement to spousal support? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for making an argument that a plaintiff has not followed a course of recommended medical treatment? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a child who is an elite athlete with professional-level prospects entitled to s. 7(1) of the BCSC's Child Support Guidelines entitled to be paid for extracurricular activities? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.