How have Rule 20 and Rule 76 interact?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Yue v. Vong, 2012 ONSC 1033 (CanLII):
In Homebrook v. Seprotech Systems Inc. [2011] O.J. No. 2404, I was required to address the interaction of Rule 20 and Rule 76 in the new situation where a two hour discovery was available to each party. The plaintiff moved for summary judgment in a wrongful dismissal action. The defendant wished to examine the plaintiff prior to the summary judgment motion being heard. The pertinent portion of my reasons reads:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for determining whether a person who suffers from motor neurone disease has a significant impairment in the way they interact with the world around them? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts considered the interaction between two expert reports? (Ontario, Canada)
What criteria must an employer apply when awarding a discretionary bonus? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for a plaintiff to recover damages in a medical malpractice case? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a party be ordered to pay full indemnity costs? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a proposed defendant have to pay for damages in a case where no valid cause of action is made out as against him? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on pain and suffering? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will legislation be found vague and unenforceable? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for seeking further examination in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of disclosure required in a motion for Mareva Injunction? (Ontario, Canada)
