Virtually the same set of facts that appeared in Browne also arose in Bazinet v. Davidson, [2007] O.J. No. 2420, 2007 CanLII 23158 (S.C.J.). There, Justice Power, of this court, considered the interaction involved between two reports by different experts. In that case, only the second expert report commissioned by a party was originally produced to the opposite side. The second report, however, mentioned the existence of the first. The expert filed a letter with the court indicating that he did read the first report, but that it did not play any role in his opinion. Was the first report subject to production?
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.