What is the test for a plaintiff to prove that he was not responsible for the injury he sustained in a motor vehicle accident?

Saskatchewan, Canada


The following excerpt is from Doyle v. Canadian Northern Railway Company, 1918 CanLII 198 (SK CA):

Holden v. Grand Trunk Ry. Co., 5 O.L.R. 301, was decided on the ground that “the injury happened in consequence of the deceased’s own neglect of orders * * * himself the author of the wrong he complained of”—Osler, J. A., p. 307.

Other Questions


How have courts dealt with a claim for damages arising out of a motor vehicle accident under the Motor Vehicle Accident Prevention Act? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether an employer is liable for injuries sustained by a plaintiff in a motor vehicle accident? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the difference between a plaintiff and plaintiff in a motor vehicle accident claim for medical attention? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a defendant be found not to be negligent in a motor vehicle accident where the vehicle is locked in a fenced-off secure area and the keys to the vehicle are locked? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for a plaintiff to prove reasonable excuse in a motor vehicle accident case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for personal injury claims in a motor vehicle accident case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the burden of proving negligence against a defendant in a motor vehicle accident case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for loss of earning capacity for a plaintiff in a motor vehicle accident? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the equitable contribution of an insurer to a plaintiff's insurance policy when they are injured in a motor vehicle accident? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for a plaintiff to succeed in her claim that she was injured in a motor vehicle accident? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.