In Hayduk v. Pidoborozny, 1972 CanLII 136 (SCC), [1972] S.C.R. 879, the respondent father was the registered owner of the motor vehicle. In the purchase agreement, he was identified as the purchaser for the purpose of guaranteeing the purchase price. However, his son had paid for the vehicle, had exclusive possession and control of the vehicle, and was driving it at the time of the accident.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.