What is the test for a parent seeking to change custody or access to their child in a new location?

Nova Scotia, Canada

The following excerpt is from S.L.D. v. P.D.M., 2008 NSSC 103 (CanLII):

In Gordon v. Goertz the law is summarized in paragraph 49 and 50: 49 The law can be summarized as follows: 1. The parent applying for a change in the custody or access order must meet the threshold requirement of demonstrating a material change in the circumstances affecting the child. 2. If the threshold is met, the judge on the application must embark on a fresh inquiry into what is in the best interests of the child, having regard to all the relevant circumstances relating to the child's needs and the ability of the respective parents to satisfy them. 3. This inquiry is based on the findings of the judge who made the previous order and evidence of the new circumstances. 4. The inquiry does not begin with a legal presumption in favour of the custodial parent, although the custodial parent's views are entitled to great respect. 5. Each case turns on its own unique circumstances. The only issue is the best interest of the child in the particular circumstances of the case. 6. The focus is on the best interests of the child, not the interests and rights of the parents. 7. More particularly the judge should consider, inter alia: (a) the existing custody arrangement and relationship between the child and the custodial parent; (b) the existing access arrangement and the relationship between the child and the access parent; (c) the desirability of maximizing contact between the child and both parents; (d) the views of the child; (e) the custodial parent's reason for moving, only in the exceptional case where it is relevant to that parent's ability to meet the needs of the child; (f) disruption to the child of a change in custody; (g) disruption to the child consequent on removal from family, schools, and the community he or she has come to know. 50 In the end, the importance of the child remaining with the parent to whose custody it has become accustomed in the new location must be weighed against the continuance of full contact with the child's access parent, its extended family and its community. The ultimate question in every case is this: what is in the best interests of the child in all the circumstances, old as well as new? While Gordon v. Goertz and other cases set out the factors to consider, a determination of whether the move is in the best interests of the child must be made on the particular facts of each case. No two cases are the same.

Other Questions

What is the test for a judge to grant a temporary order to remove a parent from custody and place the child in the custody of the access parent? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
When a child is not residing with the custodial parent on a full-time basis, is the child entitled to half of the table amount of support payable to the parent? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the impact of a change in custody of a child of one parent on the relationship of the other parent? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Is a parent's reason for moving to another parent's home not a factor in determining whether or not they were a custodial parent? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Is a step-parent required to pay child support for a child born August 22, 1997? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the standard used in assessing the best interests of a child in a custody and access case? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What are the obligations of a step-parent to the child of a child born into the marriage? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the threshold requirement of material change for variation of an order for access to a child? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for having access to a child by a third party parent? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How much is a child entitled to access expenses when the access costs are "unusually high"? (Nova Scotia, Canada)

Alexi white

"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.