Is evidence of threats made against a witness admissible as non-hearsay?

Ontario, Canada

The following excerpt is from R. v. J.A.T., 2012 ONCA 177 (CanLII):

Evidence of threats may be admissible as non-hearsay since it is the making of the threats, not their truth, that is of probative value: Subramaniam v. Public Prosecutor, [1956] 1 W.L.R. 965 (P.C.), at p. 970. But evidence of a witness’ prior out-of-court statements tendered to prove the truth of their contents is hearsay and presumptively inadmissible: Khelawon, at para. 36.

Other Questions

What is the test for using the word "similar fact evidence" in a motion where the evidence is not the same fact evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the defense have to provide affidavit evidence as to the names of the witnesses and the purpose and relevance of each witness? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a witness’s evidence considered in the context of the totality of the evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
If the evidence the Respondent submitted was to add details of conversations and was not intended or capable or capable of raising any adverse impli­cations regarding the credibility of the complainant, is it admissible evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the case law on the admissibility of expert evidence in medical malpractice cases? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a conclusion or opinion from a witness be admitted as non-expert opinion evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
What evidence of threats or abuse may form the basis of a duress claim? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a witness testify as to statements made to that witness by someone else? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any case law in which the Court has rejected evidence tendered in affidavit form as other affidavit evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a verdict of guilty be safely founded on the evidence of a single witness? (Ontario, Canada)

Alexi white

"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.