Can a s. 67 injunction be stayed because the balance of interests favors the respondent?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Aleong v. Aleong, 2013 BCSC 19 (CanLII):
An alternative argument of the respondent is that the s. 67 injunction should be stayed because the balance of interests favors the respondent. It is submitted that a stay is appropriate to achieve the ends of justice, to balance the interest of the parties and to weigh their relative prejudice. (Burke v. NYP Holdings Inc. 2005 BCSC 1287, para 15).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for a judge to craft an Order that balances the legitimate state against the interests of individual interests? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the balance of convenience in the context of a balance of interest in a news conference? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a respondent respond to an application with a sur-reply responding to new issues raised in reply? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a stay application for a custody order based on the likelihood that the stay application would affect the child's best interests? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the fact that the respondent did not expect the respondent to pay for the domestic services provided by the Respondent have any impact on an unjust enrichment claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the Respondent Respondent responded to an application for a change in parenting time? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for balancing the relevant competing interests of privacy and public interest? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the balancing of the public interest served by the police conduct and the liberty interest interfered with by that conduct? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a motion to obtain an injunction against the Respondent? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the Respondent Respondent dealt with a default judgment in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
