On my review of the material that is before me, I am not satisfied the respondent has met the tests set out in RJR‑MacDonald v. Canada, 1994 CanLII 117 (SCC),  1 S.C.R. 311, an authority upon in which the respondent relies. The respondent, in order to satisfy the RJR‑MacDonald tests, must establish a good arguable case, that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm and that the balance of convenience supports the granting of an injunction. In my view, the respondent has not established any of these three tests.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.