What jurisprudence should be considered in support of an appeal by a plaintiff in his BC Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal case?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from WCAT-2010-01012 (Re), 2010 CanLII 42441 (BC WCAT):

The worker submitted that jurisprudence, particularly Schulmeister v. British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal), 2007 BCSC 1580, be considered in support of his appeal. The worker argued that this case clarified that work-related factors need not be the primary cause of a work-related injury.

Other Questions


In a Workers’s Compensation Appeal Tribunal case, is there any case law that supports the argument that there is no case law in favour of a claim under the Employment Benefits Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal case, is there any case law supporting the proposition that a claimant’s right to sue for unfair dismissal? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the limitation of publication of the name of a plaintiff at the BC Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is cognitive impairment secondary to a compensable injury sufficient to meet the requirements of the BC Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal of BC? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on traumatic stress disorder at the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of a finding of fact by the BC Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal on a claimant’s entitlement? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on credibility issues at the BC Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a claim can be successful at the Workers’s Compensation Appeal Tribunal? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for reconsideration at the BC Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the standard of review apply to a review of a Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal decision to which the decision was patently unreasonable? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.