What is the test for whether an offer was open for acceptance?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from H.G. v. R.G., 2014 BCSC 273 (CanLII):

Whether the offer ought reasonably to have been accepted is determined not by reference to the eventual order made but rather “whether, at the time the offer was open for acceptance, it would have been reasonable for it to have been accepted”. Such reasonableness is “to be assessed by considering such factors as the timing of the offer, whether it had some relationship to the claim … whether it could be easily evaluated, and whether some rationale for the offer was provided” (Hartshorne v. Hartshorne, 2011 BCCA 29 at para. 27).

Other Questions


What is the test for whether an offer was an offer that ought reasonably to have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the factors that determine whether a plaintiff would have accepted an offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for an award of double costs for failing to accept an offer to settle that should have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the reasonableness factor in determining whether a plaintiff would have accepted an offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for whether an offer to settle was reasonably accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors are considered to determine whether a plaintiff accepts an offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the factors used to determine whether an offer to settle was open for acceptance? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the factors that determine whether an offer to settle was open for acceptance? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for whether an offer ought reasonably to have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
When is an offer not an offer that ought reasonably have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.