When the error is that the error was not intentional, does the error result in the error not being corrected?

If defendant fails to establish all the errors of the trial court as a cumulative result of the cumulative error, can he continue to argue that the cumulative effect of the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt and mandates reversal? (California, United States of America)

In re-examining the findings of the Court of Appeal's error review, what are the consequences of the error where the error is cumulative? (California, United States of America)

Is the intent of an aider and abettor to facilitate the commission of a specific intent crime necessarily the intent to achieve a future consequence? (California, United States of America)

Does the Attorney General have the authority to correct the error of a sentence imposed by a judge on a charge of assault with intent to pervert the course of justice? (California, United States of America)

Is it a federal error that crime requires general not specific intent rather than specific intent? (California, United States of America)

Does a cumulative effect of errors resulting in errors requiring reversal require reversal? (California, United States of America)

Is there any instructional error in general criminal intent instruction used by the trial court to include counts 4 and 7 in the General Criminal intent instruction? (California, United States of America)

Is there any error or error in an instruction given by the Court in the context of specific intent in the definition of first degree murder? (California, United States of America)

Can a court correct an error that resulted in a sentence being issued to a defendant who was convicted of a lesser crime but who is convicted of the lesser crime of assault? (California, United States of America)

Is there any error or error in instructing the jury that burglary required the intent to commit one of the two felonies? (California, United States of America)