California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Jonathan H. (In re Jonathan H.), A135972 (Cal. App. 2013):
" 'In assessing allegedly coercive police tactics, "[t]he courts have prohibited only those psychological ploys which, under all the circumstances, are so coercive that they tend to produce a statement that is both involuntary and unreliable." [Citation.]' [Citation.] [] A confession is not involuntary unless the coercive police conduct and the defendant's statement are causally related. [Citations.]" (People v. Williams, supra, 49 Cal.4th at p. 436.)
Page 7
"We review independently a trial court's determinations as to whether coercive police activity was present and whether the statement was voluntary. [Citation.] We review the trial court's findings as to the circumstances surrounding the confession, including the characteristics of the accused and the details of the interrogation, for substantial evidence. [Citation.] '[T]o the extent the facts conflict, we accept the version favorable to the People if supported by substantial evidence.' [Citation.]" (People v. Guerra (2006) 37 Cal.4th 1067, 1093.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.