What is the test for using a special verdict form in a motor vehicle accident?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Markow v. Rosner, 208 Cal.Rptr.3d 363, 3 Cal.App.5th 1027 (Cal. App. 2016):

Question 16 was included on the special verdict form because Civil Code section 1431.2, subdivision (a), enacted in 1986 as part of Proposition 51, provides as follows: In any action for personal injury, property damage, or wrongful death, based upon principles of comparative fault , the liability of each defendant for non-economic damages shall be several only and shall not be joint. Each defendant shall be liable only for the amount of non-economic damages allocated to that defendant in direct proportion to that defendant's percentage of fault.... (Italics added.) However, such an allocation does not apply to defendants whose liability is vicarious. (Diaz v. Carcamo (2011) 51 Cal.4th 1148, 11561157, 126 Cal.Rptr.3d 443, 253 P.3d 535.)

Other Questions


What is the test for determining whether a defendant is liable for a motor vehicle accident under the California Vehicle Accident Act or the California Motor Vehicle Act? (California, United States of America)
Does section 3110 of the Ontario Motor Vehicle Code of Civil Procedure (Motor Vehicle Accident and Accident Benefits Act) apply to a mechanic's lien claimant? (California, United States of America)
Does the phrase "as a result of" in a motor vehicle accident apply to a section of the Motor Vehicle Accident Act? (California, United States of America)
Can a plaintiff bring an action under the California Motor Vehicle Accident Prevention Act for damages arising out of a motor vehicle accident? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a special verdict in a motor vehicle accident? (California, United States of America)
Does Vehicle Code section 23558 of the California Vehicle Code provide notice of enhancements to a motor vehicle under Vehicle Code Section 12022.7? (California, United States of America)
Is an employer's claim for reimbursement under section 3852 of the California Motor Vehicle Accident and Accident Compensation Act limited to recovery for damages proximately caused by the accident? (California, United States of America)
Does the error in the form used in the on or around verdict form in a motor vehicle accident case constitute a harmless beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Does a "driver" for purposes of Vehicle Code section 20002 include an owner of a vehicle involved in a accident when the owner is also a passenger in the vehicle at the time of the accident? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a jury to award a special verdict in a motor vehicle accident case? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.