What is the test for exclusion of dog tracking evidence in a criminal case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Stevens, A131249 (Cal. App. 2012):
Appellant contends that the trial court abused its discretion by excluding the dog tracking evidence "because [the] defense established an adequate foundation." To support this contention, appellant relies primarily on People v. Malgren (1983) 139 Cal.App.3d 234 (Malgren).3
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for exclusion of evidence in a criminal case based on evidence of gang membership? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for exclusion of evidence in a criminal case under section 352 of the California Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admissible evidence in a criminal case where an expert testified that there was no evidence of criminal wrongdoing? (California, United States of America)
Does section 1101 of the California Evidence Code prohibit the admission of character or propensity evidence in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of a court's decision to remove the exclusion of evidence from evidence in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
What is the substantial evidence standard for claims of insufficiency of evidence in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
What is the impact of the exclusion of detailed evidence in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for the exclusion of duplicative evidence in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
In a criminal case, is there any case law in which a jury has been ordered to conduct cross-examination of evidence in the penalty phase? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for prejudicial evidence in the context of evidence of racial motivation in criminal cases? (California, United States of America)
