California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Carrillo, B255298 (Cal. App. 2016):
"We discuss those arguments that are sufficiently developed to be cognizable. To the extent defendant perfunctorily asserts other claims, without development and, indeed, without a clear indication that they are intended to be discrete contentions, they are not properly made, and are rejected on that basis. [Citations.]" (People v. Freeman (1994) 8 Cal.4th 450, 482, fn. 2.) We thus do not discuss any issue relating to evidence of defendant's gang membership or any other contention that has not been clearly articulated.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.