What is the test for determining whether a trial court understood and fulfilled its responsibilities under section 352 of the California Criminal Code?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Rodriguez, A149521 (Cal. App. 2018):
the trial court understood and fulfilled its responsibilities under . . . section 352.' [Citations.]" (People v. Jennings, supra, 81 Cal.App.4th at p. 1315.) In this case, the court discussed the prior offense evidence and expressly found it more probative than prejudicial under section 352. That was sufficient.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does section 1170(d)(1) of the California Criminal Code give the trial court authority to resent the sentence of a defendant pursuant to Section 1170 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be found to have committed a single physical act for purposes of section 654 of the California Criminal Code, Section 215 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 422 of the Criminal Code for carjacking? (California, United States of America)
Does section 667 of the California Criminal Code prohibit the District Attorney from invoking section 654 of the Criminal Code to strike a prior conviction enhancement under Section 667? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 1054(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure, section 1054 et. seq. and section 854 of the Criminal Code, allow defense counsel to conduct their investigation and prepare for trial? (California, United States of America)
Does section 669 of the California Criminal Code apply to determine whether a determinate or determinate sentence should run concurrently with an indeterminate sentence? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 654 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant is convicted of a sex offence under both sections of the S. 654(1) and (2) of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
How has the court interpreted section 654 of the California Criminal Code, Section 654, subdivision (a) of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does section 27 of the California Criminal Code, section 778a, subdivision (a)(1) of the Criminal Code of California apply to a defendant who is charged with a charge of conspiracy to commit a crime committed outside of the state? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of section 654 of the Criminal Code of Ontario's Criminal Code when a court finds that a conviction is subject to the provisions of Section 654, subdivision (a) of the Act of the Court of Justice? (California, United States of America)
Does section 1305, subdivision (b) of the California Criminal Code, section 977 of the Criminal Code apply to a defendant's right to be present at trial? (California, United States of America)
