The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Escamilla, 9 F.3d 1554 (9th Cir. 1993):
In reviewing sufficiency of the evidence, we determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. United States v. Torres-Rodriguez, 930 F.2d 1375, 1385 (9th Cir.1991).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.