What is the standard of review applied to a decision by a court on the admissibility of evidence?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Johnson, C086549 (Cal. App. 2020):
"Broadly speaking, an appellate court applies the abuse of discretion standard of review to any ruling by a trial court on the admissibility of evidence." (People v. Waidla (2000) 22 Cal.4th 690, 717.) "Speaking more particularly, it examines for abuse of discretion a decision on admissibility that turns on the relevance of the evidence in
Page 22
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the standard of review applied to a ruling by the appellate court on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of review standard apply to any ruling by the trial court on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied to a ruling by the appellate court on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
In applying the substantial evidence standard of review, does the court need to view the evidence in the light of the prevailing party? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of the standard of review apply to "any ruling by the trial court on the admissibility of evidence"? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied to a ruling by an appellate court on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for appellate review of a trial court ruling on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied by appellate courts to a decision by a trial court to instruct or not to instruct a jury? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of review standard apply to any ruling by the trial court on admissibility of evidence including requests for judicial notice? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of review standard apply to a ruling by a trial court on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
