The following excerpt is from United States v. Hui Hsiung, 778 F.3d 738 (9th Cir. 2014):
In invoking the per se rule for horizontal price-fixing, we join the reasoning of other circuits. See, e.g., United States v. Nippon Paper Indus. Co., 109 F.3d 1, 23, 7, 9 (1st Cir.1997) (upholding an indictment alleging a per se violation of the Sherman Act against a Japanese fax paper manufacturer that entered into a price-fixing conspiracy overseas for fax paper that was sold to companies in the United States at fixed prices.). The district court appropriately rejected the rule of reason defense.6
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.