The following excerpt is from Emilio M. v. City of New York, 332 N.E.2d 874, 37 N.Y.2d 173, 371 N.Y.S.2d 697 (N.Y. 1975):
After the arrest of respondent and his two companions in connection with serious crimes of violence and their identification by one of their victims from his hospital bed, the arresting officers took respondent to the precinct station house where he was given preinterrogation warnings (Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694) and his mother was notified without undue delay. Prior to her arrival respondent was questioned by the police officers. After her arrival the warnings were read for a second time, to both respondent and his mother and permission was requested to question the boy again in his mother's presence. Both mother and son consented and respondent made a further statement which was reduced to writing and signed by both of them.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.