What if a trial court failed to instruct the jury on self-defence?

California, United States of America

The following excerpt is from People v. Wachter, G040314 (Cal. App. 12/18/2009), G040314. (Cal. App. 2009):

This not only deprived the jury of the opportunity to render a verdict that was commensurate with the evidence in the case. (See People v. Breverman (1998) 19 Cal.4th 142, 155 [a chief rationale for requiring trial courts to instruct on all applicable theories is that it guards against verdicts that are harsher or more lenient than the evidence merits].) It also created the potential for a miscarriage of justice, given the considerations we have discussed. Other courts have found prejudicial error in the omission of instructions on a defense that was, as here, both supported by the evidence adduced at trial and consistent with the jury's verdict in the case (See, e.g., People v. Elize (1999) 71 Cal.App.4th 605 [reversing conviction due to trial court's failure to instruct on self-defense], and we cannot ignore it here.

Other Questions

In what circumstances will the jury be instructed to follow the law as instructed, rather than consider any comments by the prosecutor that conflicted with the trial court's instructions? (California, United States of America)
Can an appellant seek review of an instruction in the Superior Court of Appeal where the original instruction was found to have made errors that could have been cured in the trial court? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
Is there any instructional error in general criminal intent instruction used by the trial court to include counts 4 and 7 in the General Criminal intent instruction? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have any grounds to argue that the trial court erred in failing to give the cautionary instruction at the end of trial? (California, United States of America)
On appeal, if the trial court improperly failed to instruct on a lesser included offense, does the court have to re-examine the facts of the case? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have grounds to argue that a trial court prejudicially errs in failing to instruct the jury sua sponte at the penalty phase to disregard the no-sympathy instruction at the guilt phase? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied by appellate courts to a decision by a trial court to instruct or not to instruct a jury? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on a diminished capacity defense in the context of involuntary manslaughter? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who failed to object to the trial court's decision to conduct voir dire in open court preserve the issue for appeal? (California, United States of America)

Alexi white

"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.