Does a contractor have any responsibility if the crop to be cut or harvested fails for any cause?
Saskatchewan, Canada
The following excerpt is from Brieskorn v. Richardson, 1949 CanLII 143 (SK QB):
There is no suggestion in Webber v. Copeman that a contractor has any responsibility if the crop to be cut or harvested fails for any cause to be in a proper condition to enable the contractor to properly do his work.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a defendant have to be held responsible for damage caused to a plaintiff's horse by his or her mare? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for liability for damage caused to a person’s property by workmen who cause damage to the property? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a horse owner is responsible for damage caused to another horse by his mare? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a contractor recover from a contractor's failure to meet the specifications of a construction contract? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the liability of a private contractor who causes the construction of a bridge over the River estuary? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does the word "cause of action" mean the whole cause of action? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances can a bus driver be held responsible for the actions of his passengers? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
On what basis can the dental surgeon be found jointly responsible for the escape of blood into the lungs? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can para. 392 of the Criminal Code per se create a cause of action capable of supporting its claim? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
If a jury has been asked to respond to a question, what is the appropriate response? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
