What is the test for "re-litigation"?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Cole v. Ontario (Health and Long-Term Care), 2016 HRTO 497 (CanLII):

In the absence of a legal determination of the applicant’s medical needs, the concept of “re-litigation” simply does not apply. If there has been no legal determination, there is no risk of duplicative litigation, potential inconsistent results, undue cost, and inconclusive proceedings, the very things the abuse of process doctrine is designed to prevent. See Danyluk v. Ainsworth Technologies Inc., 2001 SCC 44.

Other Questions


In what circumstances will a defendant be estopped from relitigating the same issues raised in two separate affidavits? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a party bring an issue of issue estoppel against the party seeking to relitigate the matter? (Ontario, Canada)
Can the abuse of process doctrine be used to prevent relitigation of issues that could have been determined? (Ontario, Canada)
When will the courts turn to the doctrine of abuse of process to determine whether relitigation should proceed? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the deadlines for submissions to the Court of Appeal in the Gadomski case? (Ontario, Canada)
Can damages be assessed on an aggregate basis in an overtime claim? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a text message indicating that a foreman is no longer working with him constitute a letter of dismissal? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a motor vehicle the dominant feature of the claim? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there a cause of action for breach of statutory duty? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the law on mobility cases? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.