What is the rule of the rule on voluntary testimony?

Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v. Peddle, 2002 CanLII 14848 (NL PC):

[11] The statement of the rule, long considered definitive, is found in Ibrahim v. The King, [1914] A.C. 599 (P.C.): ...no statement by an accused is admissible in evidence against him unless it is shewn by the prosecution to have been a voluntary statement, in the sense that it has not been obtained from him either by fear of prejudice or hope of advantage exercised by a person in authority.

Other Questions


Does the Court of Appeal have any authority to interfere with a trial judge’s findings of fact based conclusions drawn from conflicting testimony of expert witnesses? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the test for “voluntary assumption of risk” in the context of a claim for negligence? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the test for assessing the merits of a commercial transaction? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the adequacy of damages assessed under the counterclaim? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
Is a judge entitled to view the place of evidence? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
Is a portion of a personal injury award regarded as a matrimonial asset? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
How have courts in India considered the value of a piece of jewellery in the context of value for sale? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
Is a collective agreement enforceable in common law? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the legal test for a stay of motion under NLCA 65? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on Charter definition? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.