What is the standard of review for the purpose of assessing facts at trial?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Charbonneau v. Ranger, 2005 CanLII 20804 (ON SC):
Counsel for the parties agree that the standard of review is palpable and overriding error which affects the assessment of facts. (Stein v. Kath K (The), 1975 CanLII 146 (SCC), [1976] 2 S.C.R. 802) Facts
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the standard of review in a family law case where the trial judge's findings of fact are based on credibility assessments? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review for an Assessment Officer to be reviewed by the Court of Appeal? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review applied to a judge's findings of fact and mixed fact and law? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review for the purposes of determining whether a decision should be reviewed in a civil proceeding? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the legal test for applying palpable and overriding error standard in appellate review of findings of fact and of mixed fact and law? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review for findings of fact or inferences of fact? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a religious institution have to be assessed for purposes of assessment purposes? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review of a trial judge’s findings of fact? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a motion of appeal against a finding of fact made by the trial judge? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a question of fact and mixed fact? (Ontario, Canada)
