The standard of review applicable to an exercise of discretion is highly deferential. A court’s exercise of discretion is reversible only where the court has misdirected itself, came to a decision that is so clearly wrong it amounts to an injustice or where the judge gave no or insufficient weight to relevant considerations: Penner v. Niagara Regional Police Services Board, 2013 SCC 19 at para. 27.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.