Having reviewed the law, I see the standard of care required as that of a reasonable medical man considering all the circumstances, including the seriousness of the condition, the risks, the patient’s capacity to comprehend and decide the question involved and the likely effect on her of the knowledge of the risks involved: Waddams, at p. 29. I am also in agreement with the elaborate exposition by Woodhouse J. in Smith v. Auckland Hospital Bd., [1964] N.Z.L.R. 241 at 250-51.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.