As to the respondent, he voluntarily quit his job. The situation in my view is analogous to the decision in Skramrud v. Skramrud, 161 A.C.W.S. (3d) 924. There, the husband relied on medical evidence to support his early retirement stating it was not voluntary. None of the medical reports provided substance for this argument and the court concluded the husband was intentionally unemployed and imputed income to him at his former level of employment for both child support and spousal support.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.