The respondent references Glick v. Gale, [2013] O.J. No. 573, ONSC to establish that the presence of a clinical issue is not needed for the court to order an assessment. Specifically, the court found that no change in circumstances was required and that certain factors were important in the court’s determination to order an assessment. The respondent submits that some of those factors apply in this case namely; the resignation of a mediator/arbitrator, a high conflict case, a contentious school issue, contradictory affidavit material, and a child who is too young to have his own counsel.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.