The respondent asserts that the time allocated to the hearing was not cut short, that the applicant and his counsel did not raise any objection in the course of the hearing and that the applicant has not shown that the length of the hearing was prejudicial to him. Furthermore, the respondent submits that the length of a hearing does not reflect the quality of a panel"s work and that a panel may limit the time allocated to a hearing, particularly when no objection is raised (Vorobieva v. M.E.I. (1994), 28 Imm.L.R. (2d) 97 (F.C.T.D.)).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.