The respondent argues that the applicant has not adduced a sufficient evidentiary foundation in support of its application. The respondent is correct to assert that it is the applicant who bears the onus of proving that the easement should be discharged (Fyfe v. James, (2006), 2006 CanLII 2186 (ON SC), 42 R.P.R. (4th) 221, [2006] O.J. No 325 (QL) (Ont. Sup.Ct.) at para. 21. It is therefore incumbent on the applicant to adduce evidence in support of its application.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.