Does the evidence of discreditable conduct support the inference that the complainant's allegation is true?

Alberta, Canada

The following excerpt is from R. v. A.J.J., 2002 ABQB 85 (CanLII):

In considering the extent to which the evidence of prior discreditable conduct supports the inference that the complainant’s allegation is true, I am of the view that the dissimilarities referred to by defence counsel do weaken the probative value of the proposed evidence. However, the proposed evidence has some probative value even in the absence of consistent similarities in the psychological and physical setting of the acts alleged or how they were carried out. The context is familial, with a person occupying a position of some authority preying on younger members of the household he shared with them. But as noted by Charron J.A. in R. v. B.(L); R v. G.(M.A.), supra, at para. 50 when addressing the matter of prejudice: is important to keep in mind what is meant by prejudice in this context. It is the effect this kind of evidence may have in compelling a trier of fact to find the accused guilty not on the strength of the evidence marshalled against him in relation to the offence with which he is charged, but on the strength of the evidence of his bad character. Therefore, it follows that, in general, the higher the probative value of the evidence, the lesser the prejudicial effect. Conversely, any weaknesses which have been identified in the course of assessing the probative value of the evidence will generally increase the prejudicial effect.

Other Questions

Is there any evidence supporting the allegation that a lender was a participant in the fraudulent scheme? (Alberta, Canada)
What are a number of cases that support the argument that objection to admissibility of evidence is to be made at the time the evidence is tendered? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the conduct of the complainant in failing to complain? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a court impute income under section 19(1)(a) of the Child Support Guidelines where the payor has pursued a deliberate course of conduct for the purpose of evading child support obligations? (Alberta, Canada)
Can an employer rely on after-acquired knowledge of misconduct to support an allegation that cause for dismissal existed at the time of the dismissal? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for finding discrimination on the basis of allegations that conduct is racially motivated? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for establishing that there is sufficient evidence to support a finding of fraud? (Alberta, Canada)
How has the court considered the relationship between child support and spousal support? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the impact of allegations of unethical conduct, misrepresentation before the court and sharp practice? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for accepting as true the evidence of a witness who has not been cross-examined? (Alberta, Canada)

Alexi white

"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.