In Peter v. Beblow, 1993 CanLII 126 (SCC),  1 S.C.R. 980 at 988, McLachlin J. for the majority said: There is a tendency on the part of some to view the action for unjust enrichment as a device for doing whatever may seem fair between the parties. In the rush to substantive justice, the principles are sometimes forgotten. These are words which, in my view, must be kept in mind in the present case.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.