The plaintiff has also contended that the amending agreement is ambiguous, and has relied on the principle enunciated in Thompson v. City of North Battleford, 1923 CanLII 328 (SK CA), [1924] 1 W.W.R. 51, to the effect that where there are two possible interpretations of a contract, and one would lead to obvious absurdity or injustice, and the other would avoid that absurdity or injustice, the latter interpretation is to be accepted.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.