Is a spouse or common-law partner entitled to the commuted value of a pension and each party’s share?

Manitoba, Canada


The following excerpt is from Dundas v. Schafer, 2012 MBQB 87 (CanLII):

The Pension Benefits Act requires independent legal advice and information as to the commuted value of a pension and each party’s share be provided to a spouse or common-law partner waiving his or her rights to a pension division on relationship breakdown. The disclosure provisions in The Pension Benefits Act are clearly intended to ensure that where an individual has a right to a portion of a plan member’s pension benefit credits, that individual should receive independent legal advice and particulars of the portion of the credits to which he or she is entitled prior to waiving those rights. (See Marcine v. Marcine, 2002 MBCA 119, [2002] M.J. No. 372.)

Other Questions


Is a party entitled to party and party costs? (Manitoba, Canada)
When a payor's pension is equalized with respect to property equalization, does the court need to consider the equalization also consider the value of the payor’s pension? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is a spouse entitled to spousal support when the spouse dies? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is a party entitled to an accounting from the Financial Reporting Authority (FPA) without a separation of the parties? (Manitoba, Canada)
Can an application to suppress the true identity of parties to contemplated litigation be made without notice to the other parties? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is an employer bound by the terms of a pension brochure or summary even when the statements contained therein are at variance with the pension plan? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a spouse is entitled to spousal support on a compensatory basis? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is a father entitled to spousal and/or child support from the time of the parties’ separation? (Manitoba, Canada)
In what circumstances will a party be bound by a third party's expectation of receiving something in return? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is there any case law where an umpire considered information of one party without the knowledge of the other party? (Manitoba, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.