In Gasparetto v. Gasparetto,  O.J. No. 860 (H.C.J.), the Supreme Court of Ontario High Court of Justice held that an early retirement incentive plan was not property in that it was gratuitous in nature on the part of the employer; however, a retirement gratuity was not gratuitous on the part of the employer as it was a right of the employee under the collective agreement. In accordance with that reasoning, the retirement gratuity was considered property for equalization purposes, but not for spousal support purposes.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.