The onus is on the defendant to establish, on a balance of probabilities, that: a) the plaintiff ought reasonably to have undergone the recommended treatment; and b) if the recommended treatment was undertaken, the plaintiff’s damages would have been reduced, (Dhanji v. Holland, 2015 BCSC 1351 relying on Gregory v. Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, 2011 BCCA 144.).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.