The necessity of a properly sworn report being before the Superintendent was decided upon in Murray v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2013 BCCA 363. In that case, the report submitted to the Superintendent had not been sworn or affirmed in the presence of a notary or commissioner. The adjudicator had held that the unsworn report, while it might be given less weight, could be considered along with all other documents before him, by virtue of the aforementioned s. 215.49(1)(d). In upholding the chambers judge’s quashing of the adjudicator’s decision, Madam Justice Newbury said:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.