Later, referring to Canadian Pacific Railway v. Turta, 1954 CanLII 58 (SCC),  S.C.R. 427, he said at para 74: These two men may have been under a misapprehension as to where the common dividing line between the two properties was, but the misapprehension extended only to the physical location of the boundary on the ground, not as to any problem with the description in the title.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.