In Peek v. Berry (1880), 37 Ch. D. 541 at 584, Sir J. Hannen says:— That which materially influences a man in taking a step, subject to the observations already made as to the breach of moral duty on the part of those who made it, gives a cause of action. It is not necessary that it should be the sole influencing motive. If it is a materially influencing motive then unless it had been present the conduct of the plaintiff might have been different, which is sufficient.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.