The law is clear that the following three elements are required to be proven in order to sustain a claim of unjust enrichment giving rise to the remedy of a constructive trust: (a) an enrichment; (b) a corresponding deprivation; and (c) an absence of a juristic reason for the enrichment. See Peter v. Beblow, 1993 CanLII 126 (SCC), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 980, 101 D.L.R. (4th) 621.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.