What are the defences of qualified privilege and fair comment?
Yukon, Canada
The following excerpt is from Ramirez v. Gale, 2017 YKSC 29 (CanLII):
“The law of defamation is essentially aimed at the prohibition of the publication of injurious false statements.” The law of defamation provides, however, for the defences of fair comment and of qualified privilege in appropriate cases. Just because someone publishes a hurtful comment does not mean that they will be liable for it if they do so in circumstances of qualified privilege or fair comment. Those who publish statements should assume a reasonable level of responsibility: Hill v. Church of Scientology of Toronto, 1995 CanLII 59 (SCC), [1995] 2 SCR 1130, at para. 137.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In what circumstances will a defence or a statutory bar defence not be pleaded? (Yukon, Canada)
Does qualified privilege apply to statements made by an employee to a supervisor? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the test for express malice in the context of privileged privilege? (Yukon, Canada)
What is solicitor-client privilege for each of the documents set out above? (Yukon, Canada)
Is there a defence that has not been shown or not? (Yukon, Canada)
Is solicitor-client privilege an important component of the Canadian legal system? (Yukon, Canada)
How have the damages in a personal injury action been calculated since the time of trial? (Yukon, Canada)
What is solicitor-client privilege for each of the documents set out above? (Yukon, Canada)
What are the factors that a trial judge should consider when deciding on the question of admissibility? (Yukon, Canada)
In what circumstances will a jury dismiss a claim for damages for slander? (Yukon, Canada)
