I am not prepared to embark on the folly noted by Côté, J.A. in Wilde v. Isfeld in terms of awarding one set of costs to Yemen on the issues upon which it was successful and another set of costs to Collavino on the issues upon which it was successful and then setting one off against the other. That is no doubt somewhat easier to do where the evidence led and trial time consumed on one issue has nothing to do with another. That is not the case here. The evidence led in this matter was generally applicable to more than one issue; and some argument overlapped.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.