Counsel for the Law Society referred to a number of cases, including Law Society of BC v. Ogilvie,  LSBC 17, which sets out the following factors that should be considered by a Hearing Panel: (a) the nature and gravity of the conduct proven; (b) the age and experience of the Respondent; (c) the previous character of the Respondent, including details of prior discipline; (d) the impact upon the victim; (e) the advantage gained, or to be gained, by the Respondent; (f) the number of times the offending conduct occurred; (g) whether the Respondent has acknowledged the misconduct and taken steps to disclose and redress the wrong and the presence or absence of other mitigating circumstances; (h) the possibility of remediating or rehabilitating the Respondent; (i) the impact on the Respondent of criminal or other sanctions or penalties; (j) the impact of the proposed penalty on the Respondent; (k) the need for specific and general deterrence; (l) the need to ensure the public’s confidence in the integrity of the profession; and (m) the range of penalties imposed in similar cases.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.